In
an earlier article it was noted that the first example of a departure from
the Biblical mode of baptism (immersion, burial) came in 251 A.D. Water
was poured upon a sick person, and this pouring was called "clinical
baptism." Many denominations have accepted this mode of baptism. Here
are some quotes from various creed books: "Affusion, or sprinkling is
sufficient for Baptism, as well as immersion" (Catholic Dictionary,
Addis and Arnold, p. 60; Question Box, p. 366); "Christ does not
specify the mode of baptism. It may be performed in any one of three ways;
namely, by sprinkling, pouring or immersion. One mode is just as valid as
another" (Luther's Catechism, Stump, p.147); "There are three
baptismal modes; immersion is not necessary, but one may be sprinkled or
poured" (Presbyterian Confession of Faith, Chapter 30, p. 157);
"Immersion is the rule of the church, and baptism by affusion
(pouring water over the child's head) is the exception...but practically
affusion has become adopted and immersion is seldom desired" (Book of
Common Prayer, p. 223).
The
Bible is unchanging and unchangeable. God says New Testament baptism: 1-is
for those who have been taught (Matthew 28:19,20), who believe (Mark
16:15,16), and have repented (Acts 2:38); 2-is a burial, a planting
(Romans 6:3-5); 3-is in water (Acts 8:35-38); 4-is for the remission of
sins (1 Peter 3:21; Acts 22:16); 5-is the act that puts one into Christ
(Galatians 3:27). No matter how many creed books teach otherwise; no
matter how many men preach differently; no matter how many people believe
the doctrines of men - the New Testament still reads the same. May it be
the goal of each of us to read His Word, accept and believe it, and obey
it!
The departures of the doctrine of "original sin" and the doctrine of "infant baptism" are closely related. We will be looking at these two departures in future columns.